Skip to Content

Shawna Cash Faces Jury Decision on Punishment

BENTONVILLE – The jury is now tasked with determining Shawna Cash’s fate following the trial for the killing of Pea Ridge police officer Kevin Apple.

Cash, a 25-year-old from Pine Bluff, was found guilty of capital murder, fleeing, two counts of aggravated assault, and obstruction of governmental operations by a panel consisting of seven women and five men.

The jury faces a weighty decision between two options: either recommending the death penalty or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

During the trial, prosecutors highlighted three aggravating factors that support seeking the death penalty. These factors included Cash’s alleged motive to avoid arrest or escape custody, disrupt governmental functions, and commit the murder in a particularly cruel manner.

In contrast, the defense, along with the prosecution, presented around 100 mitigating factors related to Cash’s upbringing, family background, mental health, and substance abuse issues. The jury also has the discretion to consider additional mitigating circumstances.

To impose a death sentence, the jury must be convinced that the aggravating factors outweigh any mitigating factors presented.

Prosecutor Joshua Robinson urged the jury to consider recommending the death penalty, emphasizing Apple’s restraint in not firing his weapon despite having a bullet in the chamber. Robinson portrayed Cash’s actions as callous, depicting her as indifferent to the consequences of her actions.

In response, Cash’s defense attorney, Katherine Streett, appealed for mercy, advocating for a life sentence without parole. Streett underscored that Cash’s conviction for capital murder ensures a life sentence in Arkansas.

Streett painted a picture of Cash’s troubled past, marked by a tumultuous childhood and a history of abuse and neglect. She implored the jury to see beyond the crime and recognize the damaged individual beneath the facade of criminality.

Robinson countered, asserting that Cash’s actions warranted a death sentence, emphasizing the gravity of her offense and the need for justice for the victim, Kevin Apple.

The trial culminated in a poignant plea from both sides, with the prosecution advocating for a just sentence reflecting the severity of the crime, while the defense sought compassion and understanding for a deeply troubled individual.

As the jury deliberates, the weight of their decision looms large, impacting not just the defendant but also the memory of the victim and the fabric of the community affected by this tragic event.