Skip to Content

Unveiling Ageism: 2 Work Queries Concealing Discrimination

Avoid restricting individuals’ potential based solely on their perceived age.

Ageism, a form of bias rooted in age, remains prevalent in various settings, including the workplace, where it is unfortunately normalized to assess individuals based on their age.

“Ageism is a subtle yet pervasive societal influence that has been ingrained in us from a young age,” remarked , the director of the Virginia Center on Aging and the author of “Ageism Unmasked: Exploring Age Bias and How to End It.”

Gendron highlighted how ageist notions are subtly woven into our culture, evident from childhood stories portraying elderly characters as witches contrasted with youthful princesses, to the booming anti-aging industry capitalizing on the desire to appear younger. This internalization of ageism breeds fear and aversion towards aging, framing it solely as a period of decline.

While aging may not directly impact you presently, it inevitably will in the future. How you perceive aging can significantly impact your lifespan. A study conducted in 2002 monitored over 600 Ohio residents aged 50 and above for twenty years, revealing that individuals with positive attitudes towards aging lived notably longer than their counterparts.

Hence, it is imperative to discard preconceived limitations on individuals’ capabilities based on age. The workplace often echoes ageist sentiments, exemplified by two prevalent ageist remarks:

“When do you plan to retire?”

This inquiry not only embodies ageism but also carries classist undertones. The assumption that all older individuals can afford and desire retirement is flawed. Many derive purpose and fulfillment from their work, regardless of age.

Instead of probing about retirement plans, a more appropriate approach during job interviews would be to inquire about the candidate’s three-year career trajectory. This shift in questioning avoids discriminatory assumptions while gauging the candidate’s commitment level effectively.

In general, refraining from unsolicited opinions regarding how colleagues should utilize their free time is crucial. Older workers are often subjected to intrusive questions like, “Don’t you want to spend more time with your grandchildren?” This assumption neglects their ability to balance personal and professional aspects effectively.

“Are you an intern?”

Even younger individuals are not immune to ageism. Assumptions regarding one’s competence or seniority based on their age or youthful appearance are rampant in professional environments, undermining their skills.

This bias is particularly pronounced for women of color, as highlighted in a 2023 study by Harvard Business Review. Younger women often face age-based comments that diminish their expertise and maturity, reflecting a broader societal issue.

Many employees hold inaccurate beliefs about age in the workplace.

Catherine Falls Commercial via Getty Images

Numerous misconceptions perpetuate ageist language in the workplace.

Apart from intrusive and ageist queries, prevalent beliefs influence individuals’ ageist tendencies. It is essential to recognize and challenge these attitudes:

The fallacy of ‘youth equals innovation’

The common association of youth with creativity and vitality overlooks the valuable insights and innovative potential of older individuals. Experience does not diminish one’s capacity for fresh perspectives and innovative thinking.

The ‘digital native’ stereotype

Labeling younger individuals as ‘digital natives’ often serves as a veiled preference for youthful candidates, disregarding older individuals’ technological proficiency.

Generational generalizations

Stereotyping entire generations, such as Millennials or Gen Z, perpetuates harmful myths. Individuals’ traits and capabilities cannot be accurately deduced based on their birth cohort.

Patronizing ‘elder-speak’

Condescending speech patterns and tones towards older individuals, known as ‘elder-speak,’ undermine their autonomy and competence. Such behavior can erode self-esteem and deter individuals from exploring new opportunities.

To combat ageism effectively, it is crucial to introspect and recognize one’s contribution to perpetuating ageist attitudes. By evaluating whether age influences our actions or judgments, we can actively challenge age-based biases and foster a more inclusive and equitable environment.