Skip to Content

Amit Patel’s Lawyers Argue for Leniency, Citing Federal Allegations of Lavish Lifestyle Funded by Stolen Jaguar Funds

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – Amit Patel, a former employee of the Jaguars, has confessed to embezzling over $22 million from the team during a three-year period, utilizing the funds for a lavish lifestyle that encompassed extravagant private jet excursions.

At 31 years old, Patel is awaiting sentencing next week subsequent to his guilty plea in December for wire fraud and illicit monetary transactions. While he could potentially receive a 30-year prison term, federal prosecutors are advocating for a minimum of seven years, contrasting with Patel’s defense team, who are pushing for a more lenient outcome.

In a detailed court submission outlining mitigating circumstances for Patel, the defense presents five sentencing alternatives, three of which exclude imprisonment. The most severe option proposed by his attorneys entails a one-year incarceration period.

The defense dossier, spanning 26 pages, disclosed that the $22 million misappropriation was not an isolated incident, as Patel had previously diverted company funds to fuel a gambling habit.

Despite Patel’s assertion that 99% of the embezzled money was squandered on online gambling, prosecutors revealed that he allocated over $5 million for personal indulgences, encompassing luxurious trips, a residence, a vehicle, a high-end timepiece, as well as Jaguars and sports memorabilia valued at tens of thousands of dollars.

Federal prosecutors submitted a comprehensive list of Patel’s major expenditures, along with photographic evidence of his vacations, as part of their sentencing memorandum. The acquisitions include substantial sums spent at various establishments such as restaurants/bars, financial/cryptocurrency ventures, and entertainment outlets like Ticketmaster and StubHub.

In a bid to mitigate the sentencing, Patel’s defense team underscored his lack of a criminal record apart from a minor drug offense, highlighting personal adversities he has faced, including paternal loss and a family tragedy.

Moreover, the defense acknowledged Patel’s prior misuse of company funds for gambling while employed at Deloitte, noting that he promptly repaid the debt with familial assistance.

Prosecutors recommended a seven-year sentence, emphasizing the gravity of Patel’s offenses and his attempts to deflect culpability onto the victim, the Jaguars organization. They underscored Patel’s breach of trust and the meticulous concealment of his fraudulent activities over an extended period to support their stance on the requisite punitive measures.

Conversely, the defense contended that the enduring repercussions of adverse publicity and societal stigma would significantly impact Patel’s future prospects, advocating for a more lenient sentencing approach.

Prosecutors discredited Patel’s attempt to portray himself as a victim of circumstance in his press release prior to pleading guilty, emphasizing his continued extravagant expenditures post-discovery of the fraud, including a substantial purchase of a Trevor Lawrence jersey.

The fraudulent scheme orchestrated by Patel exploited his administrative role in the Jaguars’ virtual credit card program, enabling him to execute numerous unauthorized transactions under the guise of falsified accounting records.

Patel funneled substantial sums, totaling millions, from the Jaguars’ accounts to his personal PayPal and online gambling accounts, depleting the embezzled funds entirely.

Citing Patel’s gambling addiction, his legal team acknowledged his status as a significant financial loss on FanDuel, while prosecutors rebuked his efforts to shift blame onto the Jaguars for failing to detect his fraudulent activities.

Prosecutors condemned Patel’s exploitation of his position of trust within the organization and his elaborate cover-up tactics, characterizing his conduct as a betrayal of the company’s confidence and a calculated scheme to siphon funds for personal gain.

These factors informed the prosecution’s sentencing recommendation, underscoring the severity of Patel’s actions and the need for substantial punitive measures, with the possibility of a 30-year prison term still looming over him.