Skip to Content

Inside a Real-Life Vishing Attack: The Dangers of Not Answering Your Phone

It all began with an unexpected phone call at approximately 10:30 a.m. on a Tuesday from a mobile number that was unfamiliar to me. While I typically refrain from answering calls from unknown individuals while working on my computer at home, on this occasion, I inexplicably chose to deviate from my usual practice and respond to the call.

Little did I realize that this initial decision would mark the onset of a sequence of errors that would unfold over the subsequent four hours, culminating in me falling victim to a voice-phishing, or vishing, scheme. By the end of this distressing ordeal, I had unwittingly transferred close to €5,000 (EUR) from my bank account and in Bitcoin to the fraudsters. Although my bank managed to intercept most of the transfers, I suffered a loss of €1,000 (EUR) that had been sent to the scammers’ Bitcoin wallet.

According to experts, irrespective of one’s proficiency in recognizing the strategies employed by attackers or experience in detecting fraudulent schemes, the fundamental element enabling the success of these perpetrators is their adeptness at exploiting human emotions, a tactic that predates modern technology.

Richard Werner, a cybersecurity advisor at Trend Micro, emphasizes the persuasive power of emotions in scam scenarios, asserting that individuals tend to overlook cautionary advice when manipulated into emotional states of fear or anger. Werner himself, a seasoned IT cybersecurity professional with two decades of experience, acknowledges falling prey to a phishing email disguised as Windows support, a simulated exercise within his organization that mercifully did not result in significant losses.

The modus operandi of scammers often hinges on triggering emotional responses, as highlighted by Javvad Malik, lead security awareness advocate at KnowBe4. Recognizing the telltale signs of a potential scam involves assessing the legitimacy of the communication, evaluating the urgency of requests, and scrutinizing emotional prompts that may indicate fraudulent intent.

In my case, the vishing scam exhibited classic red flags from the outset. An automated message alleging criminal activity linked to my national identity card in Portugal set the stage for a series of alarming revelations. Despite the glaring discrepancies and warning signs, my emotional reactions overshadowed logical reasoning, leading me deeper into the perpetrators’ trap.

The subsequent interactions with individuals posing as law enforcement officials, particularly the elaborate narrative spun by “Marco Jose” from the Portuguese GNR and “Dobra Volska” from the International Court of Justice, further underscored the psychological manipulation tactics employed by the scammers. The sense of urgency instilled by the fraudsters, coupled with coercive directives and threats, clouded my judgment and propelled me towards compliance with their demands.

The coercive tactics employed by the scammers, such as isolating me from seeking external assistance and instilling fear of implicating loved ones, further exacerbated the psychological pressure, hindering my ability to extricate myself from the fraudulent scheme.

In hindsight, seeking counsel from trusted individuals and maintaining open communication could have potentially averted the financial losses incurred during this distressing encounter. The aftermath of such scams often evokes feelings of shame and self-blame, yet it is essential to recognize the sophistication and premeditation behind these orchestrated schemes, thereby dispelling any sense of personal inadequacy.

Ultimately, the key takeaway from this harrowing experience lies in preemptive vigilance, swift disengagement from suspicious interactions, and proactive reporting of potential threats to designated security personnel. By fostering a culture of awareness and empowering individuals to recognize and respond to red flags, organizations can fortify their defenses against evolving cyber threats and safeguard against financial and emotional exploitation.