Aspen Daily News: In the ongoing discussions about land use, a recurring clash emerges between long-time residents aiming to protect their quality of life and newcomers advocating for affordable housing. How would you, as a council member, navigate these differing perspectives?
Angèle Dupré-Butchart: My approach as a council member will be guided by the Basalt 2020 Master Plan. This plan gives established residents a say in the town’s future growth, including the provision of affordable housing. By concentrating on specific areas for high-density, transit-oriented housing as detailed in the master plan, we can cater to the needs of both current residents and newcomers in search of affordable housing. The rigorous approval process and opportunities for public input ensure that long-time residents can contribute to the style and layout of any proposed housing projects. Furthermore, endorsing initiatives like the West Mountain Regional Housing Coalition’s deed restriction purchase program can offer a well-rounded solution to this ongoing discussion.
Chris Mullen: Striking a balance between the concerns of long-time residents and newcomers can be accomplished through projects that prioritize both preserving quality of life and providing affordable housing. Projects such as the one at Jadwin/Black Mountain, with its substantial affordable housing component and focus on environmental conservation, exemplify this dual objective. By addressing traffic issues and incorporating conservation of open spaces, such projects can cater to essential workers while honoring the existing character of the community.
Kaja Rumney: Recognizing the valid viewpoints on both sides, I believe in promoting constructive conversations between long-time residents and newcomers to discover mutually beneficial resolutions. Emphasizing open dialogue, innovative housing strategies, and input from various stakeholders can help strike a balance between the needs for affordable housing and the preservation of neighborhoods. By assessing the long-term effects on residents’ quality of life, we can make informed choices that enhance community well-being.
Rick Stevens: The conventional confrontational approach in land-use debates is evolving, with a greater focus on collaboration and inclusivity. By advocating for meaningful discussions, fairness, and communal values, we can progress towards decisions that improve overall quality of life. Embracing initiatives like the West Mountain Regional Housing Coalition and prioritizing economic prosperity and social well-being can lead to more sustainable governance models that benefit all residents.
Hannah Berman: To uphold Basalt’s distinct character and address the need for affordable housing, it is essential to concentrate on transit-connected, sustainable development within the Urban Growth Boundary. By emulating successful models of affordable, eco-friendly housing and prioritizing the requirements of essential workers, we can establish a more inclusive and efficient community. Approving meticulously planned projects that support public transportation and prevent urban sprawl can benefit residents, businesses, and the environment alike.
David Knight (running unopposed for mayor): By leveraging the Basalt 2020 Master Plan as a basis, we can harmonize the interests of long-time residents and newcomers by restricting development within the Urban Growth Boundary. Maximizing opportunities for affordable housing within this framework and optimizing housing mitigation requirements can help meet housing needs while safeguarding Basalt’s character. Acknowledging the necessity for compromises, this approach aims to satisfy a wide range of residents and steer the town towards sustainable growth and community prosperity.